Introduction
India's strategic focus has increasingly shifted eastward, recognizing the critical importance of Southeast Asia and the broader Indo-Pacific region for its economic prosperity and strategic security. The Act East Policy (AEP) and the embrace of the Indo-Pacific concept are foundational to this reorientation. This topic explores India's comprehensive engagement with ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations), emphasizing its centrality in the regional architecture, India's vision for the Indo-Pacific, its decision regarding RCEP, and its participation in other key groupings like Mekong Ganga Cooperation and East Asia Summit. It also highlights the crucial aspect of maritime security, including issues like freedom of navigation and the South China Sea disputes, underscoring India's commitment to a rules-based order in this vital maritime domain.
5.9.1: Act East Policy and ASEAN Centrality
Act East Policy (AEP) (2014)
Evolution: An upgrade of the "Look East Policy" (LEP, 1991), which initially focused on economic engagement with Southeast Asian economies post-Cold War.
Scope: AEP expands the engagement beyond economic ties to include strategic, political, cultural, and people-to-people connections.
"4 Cs" of AEP: Connectivity, Commerce, Culture, and Capacity Building.
Objective: Strengthen India's position as a reliable partner in the Indo-Pacific, promote regional stability, and counter-balance China's growing influence.
Source: Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) documents.
ASEAN Centrality
Definition: India views ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) as the fulcrum of its AEP and the broader regional architecture. ASEAN's own multilateral mechanisms (e.g., EAS, ARF) are considered central.
Strategic Partners: India and ASEAN became Strategic Partners in 2012.
Importance: ASEAN's unity, cohesion, and leadership are crucial for a stable, prosperous, and rules-based Indo-Pacific.
Key Takeaway: AEP signifies India's comprehensive pivot to the East, with ASEAN as its strategic anchor for regional stability and influence.
5.9.2: Indo-Pacific Concept
Definition & Drivers
Definition: A contemporary geopolitical construct that emphasizes the strategic interconnectedness of the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) and the Pacific Ocean. It signifies a shift from an "Asia-Pacific" to an "Indo-Pacific" understanding of the region.
Drivers: Recognizing the rising geopolitical and geoeconomic weight of the region, the growing influence of China, and the need for new frameworks for regional security and prosperity.
India's Vision (Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative - IPOI)
Announced: By PM Modi in 2019 at EAS.
Focus Areas (7 Pillars):
- Maritime Security
- Maritime Ecology
- Maritime Resources
- Capacity Building and Resource Sharing
- Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
- Science and Technology
- Trade Connectivity and Maritime Transport
Nature: It is an open, inclusive, and non-prescriptive framework, focusing on practical cooperation across the maritime domain.
Other Major Players' Views on Indo-Pacific
US (FOIP)
"Free and Open Indo-Pacific," emphasizing democratic values, rules-based order, and freedom of navigation.
Japan (FOIP)
Similar FOIP vision, promoting quality infrastructure investment.
Australia (FOIP)
Supports FOIP, emphasizes regional security and stability.
France
Supports FOIP, with emphasis on strategic autonomy and multilateralism (as a resident power in the Indian Ocean).
China
Views Indo-Pacific strategies (especially Quad) as attempts to contain it. Promotes its own "Belt and Road Initiative" (BRI).
5.9.3: Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)
Definition
A mega-regional free trade agreement between the 10 ASEAN member states and 5 of its dialogue partners: Australia, China, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea. It is the world's largest trade bloc by GDP.
India's Decision to Opt Out (2019)
Reasons for Opting Out:
- Trade Deficit Concerns (especially with China).
- Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) in China.
- Rules of Origin concerns (Chinese goods routing).
- Impact on Sensitive Sectors (agriculture, dairy, steel, textiles).
- Lack of robust Dispute Settlement mechanism.
Implications:
- Missed Opportunity for regional supply chain integration.
- Prompted aggressive pursuit of bilateral FTAs (Australia, UAE, UK, EU).
- Shifted focus to Supply Chain Resilience outside China (e.g., IPEF).
Nuance: India's decision reflects a balance between global integration aspirations and safeguarding domestic economic interests.
Other Key Regional Groupings
5.9.4: Mekong Ganga Cooperation (MGC)
Genesis: Launched in 2000.
Members: India and five ASEAN countries that are riparian to the Mekong River: Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam.
Objectives: Promote cooperation in five areas: tourism, culture, education, transport and communication, and potentially science and technology.
Significance: Represents a sub-regional cooperation framework, strengthening India's cultural and connectivity ties with mainland Southeast Asia, aligning with AEP.
5.9.5: East Asia Summit (EAS)
Genesis: Formed in 2005.
Role in Regional Architecture: The premier leaders-led forum in the Indo-Pacific for strategic dialogue and cooperation on broad political, security, and economic issues.
Members: The 10 ASEAN member states, plus Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Russia, and the United States. (18 members).
Significance: It serves as a key platform for India to engage with major powers and regional partners on critical strategic issues in the Indo-Pacific. It is the forum where PM Modi announced the IPOI.
ASEAN Centrality: EAS operates with ASEAN as its driving force, underscoring ASEAN's central role in the regional architecture.
5.9.6: Maritime Security
Key Pillars of Maritime Security
- Freedom of Navigation (FON): India strongly advocates for freedom of navigation and overflight in international waters, including in the South China Sea.
- UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982): India is a strong advocate for UNCLOS as the foundational legal framework.
- HADR (Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief): India is a key responder for HADR operations in the Indian Ocean region, demonstrating its role as a net security provider.
- Anti-Piracy Operations: India actively participates in anti-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia.
- Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA): Enhanced cooperation with regional partners for information sharing and surveillance.
South China Sea Disputes: India's Stance
Context: China's expansive territorial claims (nine-dash line) in the South China Sea conflict with claims by several ASEAN members (Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei) and Taiwan.
India's Stance:
- Supports freedom of navigation.
- Advocates peaceful resolution of disputes as per UNCLOS.
- Has oil exploration interests with Vietnam in disputed waters.
- Avoids taking sides in territorial claims but upholds international law.
Strategic Importance: Maritime security is paramount for India due to extensive coastline, reliance on sea lanes for trade/energy, and growing naval presence of other powers.
Study Aids & Exam Prep
Prelims-ready Notes
- Act East Policy (AEP) (2014): Upgraded from Look East (1991). Broader scope: Connectivity, Commerce, Culture, Capacity Building ("4 Cs").
- ASEAN Centrality: India views ASEAN as pivot of AEP & regional architecture. Strategic Partners (2012).
- Indo-Pacific Concept: IOR + Pacific Ocean.
- India's Vision (IPOI - Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative, 2019 EAS): 7 pillars (maritime security, ecology, resources, capacity, DRR, S&T, trade connectivity). Open, inclusive, non-prescriptive.
- Other Views: US/Japan/Aus (FOIP), China (views as containment).
- RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership): ASEAN+5. World's largest trade bloc.
- India Opted Out (2019): Due to trade deficit fears (esp. with China), NTBs, rules of origin, impact on sensitive sectors.
- Implications: Missed integration, pushed India to bilateral FTAs (Australia, UAE).
- Mekong Ganga Cooperation (MGC) (2000): India + 5 Mekong riparian ASEAN states. Focus: tourism, culture, education, transport/comm.
- East Asia Summit (EAS) (2005): Premier leaders-led forum in Indo-Pacific. ASEAN+8 (including India, US, China, Russia, Japan). ASEAN centrality.
- Maritime Security:
- Key Principles: Freedom of Navigation (FON), adherence to UNCLOS.
- South China Sea (SCS): India supports FON, UNCLOS, peaceful resolution. Oil interests with Vietnam.
- HADR: India as key responder in IOR.
- Anti-Piracy: Active participation.
Summary Table: India's Engagement with Southeast Asia/Indo-Pacific
Initiative/Concept | Key Features/Objectives | India's Role/Stance | Strategic Significance for India |
---|---|---|---|
Act East Policy | Enhanced connectivity, commerce, culture, capacity building beyond economic | Central to India's foreign policy, proactive engagement | Economic integration, counter-balancing China, regional influence |
ASEAN Centrality | ASEAN as fulcrum of regional architecture | Strategic Partner, pivotal for AEP | Stable regional order, platform for multilateral engagement |
Indo-Pacific Concept | Interconnected Indian & Pacific Oceans, rules-based order | IPOI (7 pillars), FOIP vision, inclusive | Geopolitical reorientation, counter-balancing China, maritime security |
RCEP | Mega-regional FTA (ASEAN+5) | Opted Out (2019) (trade deficit, NTBs, sensitive sectors) | Missed integration, focus on bilateral FTAs, supply chain resilience |
Mekong Ganga Co-op | Sub-regional cooperation (India + 5 Mekong states) | Strengthens cultural/connectivity ties (mainland SE Asia) | Bridge to mainland Southeast Asia, AEP pillar |
East Asia Summit (EAS) | Premier leaders-led strategic dialogue forum | Key platform for Indo-Pacific strategy & major powers | Promotes rules-based order, ASEAN centrality |
Maritime Security | FON, UNCLOS, SCS disputes, HADR, Anti-piracy | Advocating rules-based order, net security provider | Vital for trade, energy security, geopolitical influence |
Mains-ready Analytical Notes
Act East Policy and ASEAN Centrality: Cornerstones of India's Indo-Pacific Strategy:
Evolution: Transformation from "Look East" (economic) to "Act East" (strategic, cultural, comprehensive).
Pillars of AEP: Connectivity (physical, digital, people-to-people), Commerce (trade, investment), Culture (shared heritage), and Capacity Building.
ASEAN Centrality: India recognizes ASEAN as the "fulcrum" of the Indo-Pacific regional architecture. Its unity and cohesion are vital for regional stability. India strongly supports ASEAN-led mechanisms like EAS and ARF.
Strategic Rationale: Economic Integration, Counter-balancing China, Connectivity, Maritime Security.
Conclusion: The Act East Policy, with ASEAN at its core, is fundamental to India's strategy to integrate with the Indo-Pacific, promote regional prosperity, and strengthen its strategic footprint.
India's Vision for the Indo-Pacific: An Inclusive and Rules-Based Approach:
Context: The Indo-Pacific has emerged as the new geopolitical theatre, characterized by growing economic dynamism and strategic competition.
India's Vision (IPOI): Emphasizes an open, inclusive, and rules-based region. Not directed against any country. Focuses on practical cooperation across seven pillars.
Distinction from US/Japan FOIP: Converges on FOIP principles, but India emphasizes inclusivity and strategic autonomy, avoiding explicit anti-China rhetoric.
Strategic Rationale: Economic Prosperity, Counter-balancing China (without formal alliance), Maritime Security, Global Governance (UNCLOS).
Mechanisms: Participation in Quad, EAS, IORA, IPEF, and bilateral defense exercises.
Conclusion: India's Indo-Pacific vision is a comprehensive strategy that blends economic, security, and diplomatic elements, aiming to shape a stable, prosperous, and rules-based regional order, consistent with its strategic autonomy.
India's Decision to Opt Out of RCEP: Economic Sovereignty vs. Regional Integration:
Reasons: Concerns over its large trade deficit with China, potential surge in cheap imports threatening domestic industries (agriculture, dairy, steel), and inadequate safeguards on rules of origin and dispute settlement.
Arguments for Opting Out (Pro-Sovereignty): Protected domestic industries, maintained policy space for "Make in India," avoided being swamped by Chinese imports.
Arguments Against Opting Out (Pro-Integration): Missed Opportunities (largest trade bloc), Lost Influence, Competitive Disadvantage.
Implications for India's Trade Policy: Prompted India to pursue bilateral FTAs more aggressively (Australia, UAE, UK, EU) and focus on building resilient supply chains through initiatives like IPEF.
Conclusion: India's RCEP decision reflects a trade-off between embracing deeper regional integration and safeguarding its economic sovereignty and domestic interests. It represents a pragmatic choice, pushing India towards alternative trade and connectivity frameworks.
Maritime Security in the Indo-Pacific: India's Role as a Net Security Provider:
Importance: Crucial for global trade, energy security, and geopolitical stability.
Challenges: China's assertive claims (South China Sea), piracy, maritime terrorism, illegal fishing, natural disasters.
India's Stance: Strong advocate for Freedom of Navigation (FON), adherence to UNCLOS, and peaceful resolution of disputes. Significant naval presence.
India's Role as Net Security Provider: HADR, Anti-Piracy Operations, Capacity Building, SAGAR Initiative, Multilateral Cooperation (Quad, IORA, EAS, ARF).
Conclusion: India's commitment to maritime security in the Indo-Pacific is critical for its own economic prosperity and national security. Its proactive role as a net security provider and a champion of rules-based order contributes significantly to the stability and security of this vital global commons.
Current Affairs and Recent Developments (Last 1 Year)
- Quad Leaders' Summit (May 2023): Held in Hiroshima, reaffirming commitment to "Free and Open Indo-Pacific." Focused on critical tech, climate change, infrastructure, supply chain resilience, maritime domain awareness. (Source: Quad Leaders' Joint Statement).
- Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) Supply Chain Agreement (Nov 2023): India key member. Aims to build resilient, diversified, secure supply chains, reducing over-reliance on single sources (read: China). (Source: USTR, White House).
- Deepening India-ASEAN Ties (2023): Elevated to "Comprehensive Strategic Partnership" and agreed to a Vision Statement for Future Partnership, encompassing broader cooperation in trade, investment, digital transformation, maritime security, and sustainable development. (Source: MEA, ASEAN Secretariat).
- India-Australia CECA (Dec 2022) and India-UAE CEPA (May 2022): Bilateral trade deals reflecting India's strategy to pursue specific FTAs post-RCEP opt-out. (Source: Ministry of Commerce & Industry).
- Maritime Patrols and HADR: The Indian Navy continues its regular anti-piracy patrols in the Gulf of Aden and actively participates in HADR missions in the Indian Ocean region, demonstrating its commitment as a net security provider. (Source: Indian Navy, Ministry of Defence).
- SCO Counter-Terrorism Exercises (2023): As members of SCO, India and Central Asian countries participated in joint counter-terrorism exercises and discussions under the framework of SCO RATS, reinforcing their commitment to combating regional terrorism. (Source: SCO official website, Ministry of Defence).
UPSC Previous Year Questions (PYQs)
Prelims MCQs:
-
(2023) In the context of geopolitics, which of the following organizations has recently become a permanent member of the G20, largely due to India's advocacy?
- (a) African Development Bank
- (b) African Union (AU)
- (c) East African Community (EAC)
- (d) Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)
Hint: While not directly about Indo-Pacific, it reflects India's role in shaping global governance and regional architecture.
-
(2021) With reference to the "Quad", consider the following statements:
- It is a strategic security dialogue between India, Japan, South Korea and the United States.
- It aims to promote a "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" region.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 2 only
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Hint: This is a direct question on Quad, a key component of India's Indo-Pacific strategy.
-
(2018) 'Doha Development Round' of the WTO talks stalled due to differences between:
- (a) Developed and Developing Countries
- (b) Developed and Least Developed Countries
- (c) Developed Countries and BRICS Countries
- (d) Major trading blocs (e.g., EU and NAFTA)
Hint: India's trade policies and its stance in WTO negotiations impact its engagement with Southeast Asian trading partners.
Mains Questions:
-
(2021) "The global order is rapidly shifting from a unipolar to a multipolar world." Discuss the implications of this shift for India's foreign policy. (15 Marks)
Direction: India's Act East Policy and Indo-Pacific strategy are central to its foreign policy response to a multipolar world, aiming to shape regional architecture and balance power.
-
(2019) What is the significance of the 1994 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea? Discuss its key provisions and their implications for maritime security. (15 Marks)
Direction: Directly relevant to this topic. Discuss UNCLOS as the legal framework for maritime security, India's adherence, and its application to issues like the South China Sea disputes and freedom of navigation.
-
(2017) "India's foreign policy is best understood through the lens of strategic autonomy, which blends elements of both realism and liberalism." Discuss. (15 Marks)
Direction: India's Act East Policy and Indo-Pacific vision (e.g., Quad engagement for security, emphasis on rules-based order) are prime examples of this blend, balancing power politics (realism) with multilateral cooperation and norms (liberalism).
Trend Analysis (Last 10 Years)
UPSC's questioning on India and Southeast Asia/Indo-Pacific has seen a consistent and significant increase, reflecting the region's paramount strategic importance for India. The trend is towards analytical, comprehensive, and current affairs-driven questions.
Prelims:
- Earlier: Might have focused on basic facts about ASEAN or Look East Policy.
- Current Trend: Questions are increasingly conceptual and specific about key policies (Act East, IPOI), strategic groupings (Quad, EAS), and economic decisions (RCEP opt-out). Strong emphasis on understanding the rationale behind India's strategies (e.g., balancing China, connectivity imperatives) and the implications of major regional developments (e.g., SCS disputes, IPEF).
Mains:
- Earlier: Could involve a descriptive account of India-ASEAN relations.
- Current Trend: Questions demand critical analysis of the depth, strategic drivers, and challenges of India's engagement. Expected to analyze evolution of policies, discuss strategic competition, examine economic/security dimensions, evaluate major policy decisions, and utilize recent events.
Overall, UPSC seeks candidates who understand the dynamism, multi-faceted nature, and strategic significance of India's engagement with Southeast Asia and the broader Indo-Pacific, recognizing its role in India's aspiration for a leading global power status and its contribution to regional stability.
Original MCQs for Prelims
-
The "Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI)", announced by India at the East Asia Summit (EAS), primarily aims to:
- (a) Establish a military alliance to counter specific regional powers.
- (b) Focus solely on marine resource exploitation in the Indian Ocean.
- (c) Promote an open, inclusive, and rules-based maritime domain through seven pillars of cooperation.
- (d) Create a single economic bloc spanning the Indian and Pacific Oceans.
Explanation: IPOI is India's vision for the Indo-Pacific, focusing on cooperation across seven pillars related to the maritime domain, emphasizing inclusivity and a rules-based order, rather than a military alliance or sole economic focus.
-
India decided to opt out of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) negotiations primarily due to concerns about:
- (a) Its focus on non-economic pillars like security cooperation.
- (b) The inclusion of countries with whom India has no diplomatic ties.
- (c) The potential for a surge in imports, particularly from China, impacting domestic industries.
- (d) Its emphasis on a common currency union.
Explanation: India's primary reasons for opting out of RCEP were concerns over its large trade deficit with China, the potential for a flood of cheap Chinese imports, and the impact on its sensitive domestic sectors.
Original Descriptive Questions for Mains
-
"India's Act East Policy, a cornerstone of its foreign policy, has successfully transcended its initial economic focus to encompass strategic, cultural, and people-to-people engagements. Discuss how this policy, coupled with India's Indo-Pacific vision, contributes to regional stability and counter-balancing efforts in the changing geopolitical landscape." (15 Marks)
Key Points/Structure:
- Introduction: Define Act East Policy (AEP) as an upgrade from Look East, broadening its scope. Introduce its link to India's Indo-Pacific vision.
- Evolution and Comprehensive Scope of AEP: From purely economic to "4 Cs": Connectivity, Commerce, Culture, Capacity Building. Emphasize land and maritime connectivity, people-to-people ties.
- Synergy with India's Indo-Pacific Vision: IPOI (Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative), Shared Principles (UNCLOS, FON, peaceful resolution).
- Contribution to Regional Stability and Counter-balancing Efforts: Economic Integration, Strategic Balancing (alternative democratic partner), Maritime Security (joint exercises, HADR), Multilateral Engagement (ASEAN-led forums, Quad), Capacity Building.
- Conclusion: AEP integrated with IPOI is a comprehensive and strategic endeavor, fostering stable, prosperous, rules-based regional order, contributing to India's influence and providing balancing force.
-
"The South China Sea (SCS) dispute is a complex maritime flashpoint with significant geopolitical implications for global trade and regional stability. Examine India's nuanced approach to the SCS dispute, particularly concerning its strategic interests and adherence to international law." (20 Marks)
Key Points/Structure:
- Introduction: Describe SCS as contested region (9-dash line, overlapping claims), its global significance (SLOCs, resources).
- Key Aspects of the Dispute: China's Assertive Claims (island building, militarization), Economic Significance, Legal Framework (UNCLOS, 2016 PCA ruling).
- India's Nuanced Approach: Support for FON & Overflight, Adherence to UNCLOS, Peaceful Resolution, Avoidance of Taking Sides on Sovereignty Claims, Oil Exploration Interests (with Vietnam), Maritime Diplomacy.
- Strategic Interests for India: Economic (secure SLOCs), Geopolitical (countering China), Rules-Based Order (upholding int'l law), Act East Policy (ties with ASEAN claimants).
- Challenges: Balancing ties with China, avoiding direct confrontation.
- Conclusion: India's approach is a delicate balancing act, driven by commitment to rules-based order, strategic/economic interests, and regional stability. Firm stance on FON/UNCLOS implicitly challenges China.