Post-Mauryan Architecture

Diversification, Regional Styles, and the Genesis of Indian Temple Forms

Explore a pivotal era in Indian history where imperial grandeur gave way to diverse local patronage, fostering unique architectural expressions and laying the groundwork for future classical styles.

Begin Exploration

Introduction to a Transformative Era

The period following the decline of the Mauryan Empire (c. 185 BCE onwards) marks a significant transformation in Indian architecture. Unlike the centralized imperial patronage of the Mauryans, the Post-Mauryan era witnessed a diversification of patronage, primarily by local rulers, guilds, merchants, and religious communities. This led to the emergence of distinct regional styles and a broader range of architectural forms.

Key developments include the elaboration of stupas, the proliferation of rock-cut caves (Chaityas and Viharas), and the beginnings of structural temples. The Kushana period in the North-West introduced Greco-Roman influences, particularly in sculptural art on Buddhist structures, while the Ikshvaku period in the Deccan saw the flourishing of Buddhist monastic complexes alongside early Brahmanical temples at Nagarjunakonda, showcasing remarkable religious coexistence. This era laid the foundational elements for the classical architectural styles that would fully blossom in the Gupta period.

Shunga, Kanva, Satavahana Period (c. 2nd Century BCE - 2nd Century CE)

This period is marked by a resurgence of Brahmanism and the continued flourishing of Buddhism, leading to significant developments in stupa architecture and rock-cut cave complexes. Patronage was largely decentralized.

General Characteristics

Stupa Architecture: Key Examples

Sanchi Stupa Torana

Sanchi Stupa (Madhya Pradesh)

Originally built by Ashoka, significantly elaborated under Shunga and Satavahana rule.

  • Mauryan Core: Smaller brick stupa by Ashoka.
  • Shunga Period: Enlarged, stone casing, Vedika added.
  • Satavahana Period: Four magnificent, intricately carved Toranas (gateways) added.
  • Sculptural Style: High relief, dynamism, detailed Buddhist narratives.
  • Significance: Best-preserved and most elaborate stupa complex in India.
Bharhut Stupa Railing

Bharhut Stupa (Madhya Pradesh)

Built during the Shunga period, older than Sanchi's stone work.

  • Shunga Period: Constructed around 150 BCE.
  • Characteristics: Early examples of Buddhist narrative art on stone railings.
  • Sculptural Style: Figures are relatively flat, less voluminous, shallow relief, often frontal.
  • Iconography: Crucial for early Buddhist iconography, including aniconic Buddha.
  • Current State: Most remains are in the Indian Museum, Kolkata.

Rock-Cut Caves: Chaityas & Viharas

Predominantly found in the Western Deccan, these caves reveal ingenuity in imitating wooden structures in stone.

Chaityas (Prayer Halls)

Generally rectangular halls with a semi-circular or apsidal (horseshoe-shaped) end, divided into a nave, apse, and two side aisles by rows of pillars. A rock-cut stupa is located at the apsidal end.

Key Examples:

  • Bhaja Caves (Maharashtra, c. 2nd-1st BCE): One of the earliest, relatively simple, with prominent wooden elements imitated in stone. Stupa is plain.
  • Karle Caves (Maharashtra, c. 1st CE): The largest and finest Chaitya hall, known for its grand entrance, massive pillars, and towering stupa. Impressive two-storeyed wooden porch facade.
  • Kanheri Caves (Maharashtra, c. 1st-9th CE): Large complex, includes a significant Chaitya hall (Cave 3) similar to Karle, but with later additions.
Viharas (Monasteries/Dwelling Halls)

Simple rectangular halls with cells for monks carved on all sides, often around a central courtyard. A verandah usually fronts the main hall. Served as residential quarters for Buddhist monks.

Key Examples:

  • Nasik Caves (Pandavleni Caves, Maharashtra): Group of Buddhist Viharas, including one (Cave 3) that was a major monastic complex with intricate carvings and inscriptions.
  • Junnar Caves (Maharashtra): Another large group of Buddhist caves, mostly Viharas.

Patronage: Predominantly Buddhist monks and lay followers, wealthy merchants and guilds.

Early Structural Temples: The Nascent Stage

Significance of Early Structural Temples

Few structural temples from this early period have survived due to perishable materials (wood, mud-brick) and later rebuilding. They are characterized by simple, basic layouts with a small, square sanctum (Garbhagriha) and a small, flat-roofed porch (Mandapa).

The Besnagar (Vidisha) Heliodorus pillar (2nd century BCE), associated with a Garuda-dhvaja erected in front of a Vishnu temple, indicates the presence of such temples even if the structure itself is lost. This represents the crucial nascent stage of Hindu temple architecture, moving from temporary shrines to permanent, dedicated structures.

Summary: Shunga, Kanva, Satavahana Architecture

Feature Stupas (Sanchi, Bharhut) Rock-Cut Caves (Karle, Bhaja) Early Structural Temples
Patronage Rulers (Satavahana), guilds, merchants, commoners Merchants, guilds, lay devotees, monks Early Brahmanical patrons
Materials Stone casing, railings, Toranas Carved from solid rock Stone (scarce), brick, wood
Key Architectural Dev. Enlargement, elaborate Toranas, stone Vedikas Imitation of wooden forms, barrel-vaulted roofs, apsidal Chaityas, Viharas Simple Garbhagriha + Mandapa, flat roof
Sculptural Style High relief, narrative, aniconic Buddha (Sanchi), flat figures (Bharhut) Often plain exteriors, some relief carvings on facade/pillars Minimalistic, focus on basic structure
Purpose Reliquary, worship, narrative depiction Monastic dwellings (Viharas), prayer halls (Chaityas) Shrine for deity
Significance Transition from simple mounds to monumental, narrative art Setting pattern for future cave architecture Genesis of freestanding Hindu temple architecture

Kushana Period (c. 1st Century CE - 3rd Century CE)

The Kushana Empire, a cultural melting pot, profoundly influenced architectural and artistic developments, especially in the North-West, notably by introducing the human form of Buddha.

Sculptural Schools and Iconography

These schools primarily influenced the sculptural decoration on architectural elements, particularly the human representation of the Buddha.

Gandhara Buddha Sculpture

Gandhara School (North-West India)

Strong Greco-Roman (Hellenistic) influences.

  • Buddha Representation: Humanistic, realistic depiction of Buddha.
  • Features: Wavy hair, muscular physique, Roman toga-like drapery.
  • Material: Often in grey sandstone or stucco.
  • Integration: Sculptures integrated into stupa drum reliefs, gateways, vihara complexes.
Mathura Buddha Sculpture

Mathura School (Central India)

Indigenous style, evolved from earlier Yaksha/Yakshini traditions.

  • Buddha Representation: Idealized, youthful, smiling face.
  • Features: Shaven head or short curly hair, broad shoulders, translucent drapery revealing the body.
  • Material: Predominantly in red sandstone.
  • Integration: Adorned stupas, viharas, and early Brahmanical temples.

Significance: The emergence of the anthropomorphic Buddha image was a revolutionary development, providing a central icon for Buddhist worship.

Key Architectural Examples

Kanishka's Grand Stupa

Kanishka's Grand Stupa (Peshawar, Pakistan)

  • Description: Built by Emperor Kanishka (c. 1st-2nd CE).
  • Monumental Scale: Described as one of the tallest structures of its time (over 400 feet).
  • Materials: Massive stone base, multiple wooden storeys, iron mast and umbrella.
  • Significance: Zenith of Kushana stupa architecture, blend of stone and wood.
Taxila Monastic Complex

Taxila (Pakistan)

  • Dharmarajika Stupa: Large stupa mound, surrounded by smaller stupas and shrines.
  • Monastic Complexes: Sites like Jaulian and Mohra Moradu feature well-preserved viharas.
  • Features: Cells, assembly halls, courtyards, often adorned with stucco sculptures (Gandhara style).
  • Importance: Indicates complex monastic establishments.

Architectural Characteristics

Summary: Kushana Architecture

Feature Stupas & Viharas (North-West India) Gandhara School (Sculpture) Mathura School (Sculpture)
Primary Region North-West India (Peshawar, Taxila) North-West India, Afghanistan Mathura and surrounding regions
Key Architectural Dev. Monumental scale, use of stone & wood/stucco Influenced sculptural decoration on structures Influenced sculptural decoration on structures
Sculptural Style Integrated Greco-Roman forms (Gandhara) Humanistic Buddha, wavy hair, drapery, grey sandstone Idealized Buddha, smiling face, translucent drapery, red sandstone
Purpose Reliquary, monastic dwelling, worship Iconography of Buddha/Bodhisattvas Iconography of Buddha/Bodhisattvas
Significance Largest stupas, fusion of styles, iconic Buddha image emerges Introduction of anthropomorphic Buddha in Greco-Roman style Indigenous anthropomorphic Buddha image, influence on Gupta art

Ikshvaku Period: Nagarjunakonda (c. 3rd Century CE - 4th Century CE)

The Ikshvaku dynasty, patrons in the Krishna Valley, developed a distinct architectural style at Nagarjunakonda, a site of remarkable religious coexistence.

Buddhist Architecture

Nagarjunakonda Stupa

Unique Stupas & Ayaka Platforms

  • Unique Design: Many stupas exhibited a distinctive cruciform (wheel-shaped or Ayaka) plan in their Anda (drum).
  • Ayaka Platforms: Projections at the four cardinal directions around the stupa base, adorned with carved white limestone slabs.
  • Amravati School Influence: Sculptures show dynamic, narrative, graceful figures, strong emphasis on movement.
  • Iconography: Buddha depicted both aniconically and anthropomorphically.
Buddhist Viharas at Nagarjunakonda

Chaityas and Viharas

  • Types: Both structural monastic complexes (viharas) and rock-cut chaityas were found.
  • Layout: Viharas often comprised multiple cells, common halls, and meditation chambers around courtyards.
  • Purpose: Served as centers for monastic life, education, and worship.
  • Patronage: Primarily by Ikshvaku queens and wealthy lay devotees.

Brahmanical Temples: Religious Coexistence

A Harmony of Faiths

A striking feature of Nagarjunakonda was the presence of numerous early Brahmanical temples alongside Buddhist establishments. These were dedicated to various Hindu deities like Shiva, Vishnu, Karthikeya, and Mother Goddesses.

They were typically early structural temples with a simple square garbhagriha (sanctum) and a small mandapa (porch), often with flat roofs. These represent some of the earliest surviving examples of distinct Brahmanical temple architecture, highlighting the strong syncretic tendencies of ancient Indian society where different religious traditions flourished side-by-side.

Summary: Ikshvaku Architecture (Nagarjunakonda)

Feature Buddhist Architecture (Stupas, Chaityas, Viharas) Brahmanical Temples
Patronage Ikshvaku Queens, wealthy lay devotees Ikshvaku rulers, other patrons
Key Architectural Dev. Cruciform/wheel-shaped stupa plan, Ayaka platforms Early structural temples, simple Garbhagriha + Mandapa, flat roof
Sculptural Style Amravati School (white limestone), dynamic, narrative, both aniconic & anthropomorphic Buddha Generally less ornate in early forms, focus on deity
Purpose Reliquary, monastic dwelling, worship, education Shrine for deity, ritualistic worship
Significance Unique stupa design, Amravati art peak, religious coexistence Crucial stage in the evolution of Hindu structural temple architecture

Evolution of Architectural Forms

1

Mauryan Period (c. 322-185 BCE)

Centralized imperial patronage. Monolithic pillars (Ashokan edicts), simple brick stupas, early rock-cut caves (Barabar). High polish on stone.

2

Shunga, Kanva, Satavahana Period (c. 185 BCE - 2nd CE)

Decentralized patronage. Enlargement and stone casing of stupas (Sanchi, Bharhut), elaborate Toranas, proliferation of rock-cut Chaityas & Viharas (Karle, Bhaja). Beginning of structural temples.

3

Kushana Period (c. 1st - 3rd CE)

North-West India, Central Asia. Monumental stupas (Kanishka's Grand Stupa). Emergence of anthropomorphic Buddha in Gandhara (Greco-Roman) and Mathura (indigenous) styles, integrated into architectural spaces.

4

Ikshvaku Period (c. 3rd - 4th CE)

Krishna Valley (Nagarjunakonda). Unique cruciform stupa plans, Amravati sculptural style (dynamic, narrative). Coexistence of Buddhist monastic complexes and early Brahmanical structural temples.

5

Towards Gupta Period (c. 4th - 6th CE)

The groundwork laid in the Post-Mauryan era culminates in the classical golden age of Indian temple architecture, marked by more elaborate structural temples and refined iconography.

Mauryan vs. Post-Mauryan Architecture

A direct comparison highlighting the key shifts and continuities between these two transformative periods.

Mauryan Period

  • Patronage: Centralized, Imperial (Emperor Ashoka).
  • Materials: Extensive monolithic stone, highly polished.
  • Key Forms: Monolithic pillars (Dhamma propagation), wooden palaces, simple brick stupas, early rock-cut caves (Barabar).
  • Sculptural Style: Court art, formal, often singular animal capitals, aniconic Buddha.
  • Religious Influence: Strong state-sponsored Buddhist/Ajivika propagation.

Post-Mauryan Period

  • Patronage: Decentralized, local rulers, guilds, merchants, commoners.
  • Materials: Stone casing, less polish, continued brick, beginning of structural temples.
  • Key Forms: Elaboration of stupas (Toranas, Vedikas), complex rock-cut caves (Chaityas & Viharas), early structural temples.
  • Sculptural Style: Narrative art, folk elements, emergence of anthropomorphic Buddha (Kushana), regional styles (Amravati).
  • Religious Influence: Continued Buddhist, flourishing Brahmanism and Jainism, with regional styles.

Current Affairs & Recent Developments

While specific new archaeological discoveries from these ancient periods are rare on an annual basis, ongoing efforts often relate to conservation, digital documentation, and re-interpretation.

Conclusion & Significance

A Foundation for India's Architectural Future

The Post-Mauryan period represents a dynamic phase in Indian architecture, characterized by regional artistic flourishing and the proliferation of various architectural forms under diverse patronage. The elaboration of stupas at Sanchi and Bharhut, with their intricate narrative carvings, showcases the developing Buddhist art. The remarkable rock-cut caves of the Western Ghats (Karle, Bhaja) demonstrate ingenious stone craftsmanship, mimicking wooden structures, and serving as vital monastic centers.

The Kushana period introduced a synthesis of indigenous and foreign artistic influences, particularly in the anthropomorphic representation of Buddha, while the Ikshvaku period at Nagarjunakonda stands as a testament to unique stupa designs and the simultaneous growth of Buddhist and Brahmanical structural temples. This era, by decentralizing patronage and fostering regional styles, laid the crucial groundwork for the diverse and elaborate temple architectures that would define the subsequent classical periods of Indian history.

UPSC Previous Year Questions

Prelims MCQs

PYQ 2018 - Prelims

Q. With reference to the cultural history of India, consider the following statements:

  1. White marble was used in the construction of the Lomas Rishi Cave.
  2. The Barabar Caves were excavated and dedicated to the Ajivikas by Emperor Ashoka.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: (b)

Hint/Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect; Lomas Rishi Cave (part of Barabar Caves) is a rock-cut cave carved from granite/gneiss, not built with marble. Statement 2 is correct; Ashoka indeed dedicated the Barabar Caves to the Ajivika sect.

PYQ 2016 - Prelims

Q. Which of the following is/are the feature/features of the Dravidian style of temple architecture?

  1. The presence of a grand gopuram at the entrance.
  2. Use of a single, monolithic rock for the entire temple.
  3. A pyramidical tower called Vimana.

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

(a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: (c)

Hint/Explanation: Gopuram and Vimana are key features of Dravidian style. Statement 2 is incorrect as most Dravidian temples are built using multiple blocks of stone, not monolithic (except some early examples like the monolithic temples at Mahabalipuram).

PYQ 2013 - Prelims

Q. Some Buddhist rock-cut caves are called Chaityas, while others are called Viharas. What is the difference between the two?

(a) Vihara is a dwelling place, while Chaitya is a hall of worship. (b) Chaitya is a dwelling place, while Vihara is a hall of worship. (c) Both are dwelling places but Vihara is circular in plan, while Chaitya is rectangular. (d) Both are halls of worship, but Chaitya is an older form.

Answer: (a)

Hint/Explanation: This question directly tests the distinction between Chaitya and Vihara, which are central to Post-Mauryan rock-cut cave architecture (Subtopic 2.3.1.2). Viharas are residential quarters for monks, while Chaityas are congregational prayer halls, often with a stupa.

Mains Questions

PYQ 2020 - Mains (GS-I)

Q. Differentiate between the cultural art and architecture of Mauryan and Post-Mauryan periods. (250 words)

Value Points:

  • Patronage: Mauryan (centralized, imperial, state-sponsored, Ashoka) vs. Post-Mauryan (decentralized, local rulers, guilds, merchants, commoners).
  • Materials: Mauryan (prominent use of monolithic stone, highly polished) vs. Post-Mauryan (stone casing, less polish, continued use of brick, beginning of structural temples).
  • Forms: Mauryan (Monolithic pillars, wooden palaces, simple brick stupas, early rock-cut caves) vs. Post-Mauryan (Elaboration of stupas, complex rock-cut caves, early structural temples).
  • Sculptural Style: Mauryan (court art, highly polished, formal, often singular animal capitals, aniconic) vs. Post-Mauryan (narrative art, more folk elements, emergence of anthropomorphic Buddha in Kushana, regional styles like Amravati).
  • Religious Influence: Mauryan (strong Buddhist/Ajivika propagation by state) vs. Post-Mauryan (continued Buddhist, but also flourishing Brahmanism, Jainism, with regional styles).
PYQ 2016 - Mains (GS-I)

Q. Early Buddhist Stupas, while architecturally simple, were a rich medium of sculptural expression. Elaborate. (200 words)

Value Points:

  • Architectural Simplicity (Form): Basic stupa structure (Anda, Harmika, Yashti, Chhatra, Medhi) was primarily a solid mound/dome. Functionally a reliquary and circumambulation path.
  • Rich Sculptural Expression (Decoration): Toranas & Vedikas as primary canvas (Sanchi, Bharhut). Narrative Art: Jataka tales, Buddha's life (aniconically at first, later anthropomorphically). Folk Elements: Yakshas, Yakshinis. Symbolism: Enhanced meaning of stupa. Regional Styles: Bharhut's flatness, Sanchi's dynamism, Amravati's elegance.
  • Purpose: Sculptures transformed the stupa into a vibrant, accessible 'picture book' for devotees, serving both religious and didactic purposes.
PYQ 2014 - Mains (GS-I)

Q. Discuss the main features of Mauryan art and architecture. (200 words)

Value Points:

  • State Patronage: Emperor Ashoka's role.
  • Transition to Stone: Extensive use of stone, monumental scale.
  • Monolithic Nature: Pillars carved from single rock.
  • Highly Polished Surface: Unique Mauryan polish.
  • Pillars: Freestanding, Dhamma edicts, animal capitals (Sarnath Lion Capital).
  • Palaces: Primarily wooden, grandeur (Pataliputra).
  • Stupas: Early, simpler brick stupas.
  • Cave Architecture: Rock-cut caves (Barabar, Nagarjuni), highly polished interiors, gifted to Ajivikas.
  • Popular Art: Terracotta figures, ring stones (contrasting with imperial style).

Challenge Your Knowledge: Original MCQs

Original MCQ 1

Q. Which of the following statements about the Post-Mauryan period's rock-cut caves in Western Deccan is/are correct?

  1. They primarily served as places of worship for Ajivika ascetics, similar to Mauryan cave architecture.
  2. The Karle Chaitya hall is notable for its imitation of wooden architectural elements in stone.
  3. Most of these caves were located along important trade routes, indicating patronage from merchant guilds.

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: (b)

Explanation:
Statement 1 is incorrect. While Mauryan caves (Barabar, Nagarjuni) were for Ajivikas, Post-Mauryan rock-cut caves in Western Deccan (Karle, Bhaja, Nasik, Kanheri) were predominantly Buddhist.
Statement 2 is correct. The Karle Chaitya, like many early rock-cut caves, meticulously mimics wooden structural elements (like ribbed ceilings and facade details) in stone.
Statement 3 is correct. The strategic location of these caves along trade routes and numerous inscriptions confirm significant patronage from wealthy merchant guilds, who often sponsored the construction of these Buddhist complexes.

Original MCQ 2

Q. With reference to the architectural and sculptural developments during the Kushana period, consider the following statements:

  1. The Gandhara school of art was characterized by aniconic representations of Buddha and extensive use of red sandstone.
  2. Kanishka's Grand Stupa at Purushapura (Peshawar) was known for its purely stone construction and modest height.
  3. The Mathura school developed an indigenous style of Buddha image with a smiling face and translucent drapery.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: (b)

Explanation:
Statement 1 is incorrect. The Gandhara school was known for anthropomorphic (human) representations of Buddha, and primarily used grey sandstone or stucco, not red sandstone. Aniconic representation was characteristic of earlier periods.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Kanishka's Stupa was famous for its monumental height (one of the tallest structures of its time) and was built with a combination of stone base and multiple wooden storeys, not purely stone.
Statement 3 is correct. The Mathura school developed an indigenous style of Buddha image, distinct from Gandhara, featuring a characteristic smiling face and translucent drapery.

Original Descriptive Questions

Original Descriptive 1

Q. "The Post-Mauryan period stands as a testament to the decentralization of architectural patronage and the simultaneous diversification of artistic forms in ancient India." Analyze this statement with specific examples from the Shunga, Satavahana, and Kushana periods. (250 words)

Key Points/Structure:

  • Introduction: Briefly state how the Post-Mauryan era differs from Mauryan centralized patronage and led to diverse architectural styles.
  • Decentralized Patronage: Explain how local rulers, merchant guilds, traders, and individual devotees replaced the imperial state as primary patrons. Cite examples: Inscriptions at Sanchi, Karle, Nasik.
  • Diversification of Forms and Styles:
    • Stupas: Elaboration from simple Mauryan mounds to grand structures with ornamented Vedikas and Toranas (Sanchi, Bharhut), showcasing narrative art.
    • Rock-cut Caves: Proliferation of Chaityas and Viharas (Karle, Bhaja) in Western Deccan, mimicking wooden structures.
    • Sculptural Schools: Emergence of distinct regional schools like Gandhara (Greco-Roman influence, humanistic Buddha) and Mathura (indigenous, idealized Buddha), shaping iconography.
    • Early Structural Temples: Rudimentary forms of Brahmanical temples beginning to appear, indicating diversification of religious architecture.
  • Conclusion: Conclude that this decentralization fostered regional artistic identities and a richer, more varied architectural landscape.
Original Descriptive 2

Q. Nagarjunakonda serves as a significant archaeological site to understand the interplay of religious coexistence and architectural innovation in early Indian history. Elaborate. (200 words)

Key Points/Structure:

  • Introduction: Introduce Nagarjunakonda as a unique site demonstrating religious harmony and architectural advancements in the Ikshvaku period.
  • Religious Coexistence: Highlight the simultaneous flourishing of Buddhist monastic complexes and Brahmanical temples. Mention shared space and patronage by both Buddhist and Brahmanical elites.
  • Architectural Innovation:
    • Buddhist Architecture: Unique cruciform stupa plans, distinctive Ayaka platforms with Amravati-style sculptures (dynamic, narrative, white limestone).
    • Brahmanical Temples: Earliest examples of structural Hindu temples with simple Garbhagriha and Mandapa, showing nascent stage of temple architecture.
  • Interplay: Discuss how ideas and artisans might have been shared, leading to mutual influence. Architectural forms reflect the varied religious landscape.
  • Conclusion: Nagarjunakonda exemplifies how architecture reveals societal values like religious pluralism and regional innovation.