S&T Policy Landscape in India

An interactive exploration of India's Science & Technology policies, their evolution, impact, and future trajectory.

Introduction

India's progress in Science & Technology (S&T) has been significantly shaped by a series of visionary policies crafted since independence. These policies have evolved over time, adapting to changing national priorities, global technological shifts, and socio-economic imperatives.

From the foundational Scientific Policy Resolution of 1958, which laid the groundwork for state-led S&T development, to the contemporary focus on innovation, open science, and strategic technologies in the Draft National Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (STIP) 2020, each policy has marked a distinct phase in India's journey towards scientific self-reliance and global leadership. Understanding this policy evolution is crucial for grasping India's S&T trajectory and its future aspirations.

Detailed S&T Policy Analysis

Scientific Policy Resolution (SPR) 1958

Context
  • Newly independent India, aiming for self-reliance and modernization.
  • Nehru's strong belief in scientific temper and its role in national development.
  • Desire to establish a robust scientific infrastructure to address poverty, disease, and illiteracy.
Key Objectives
  1. Foster Scientific Temper: Promote a scientific way of thinking and rational outlook among the populace (Article 51A(h) - Fundamental Duty).
  2. Promote Research: Encourage and sustain pure and applied research in all branches of science and technology.
  3. Ensure Adequate Scientists: Ensure a continuous supply of scientists and technologists and provide them with suitable conditions for work.
  4. Integrate S&T with National Development: Apply scientific knowledge for defense, agriculture, industry, health, and economic development.
Salient Features/Highlights
  • State Patronage: Emphasized the government's primary responsibility to foster, promote, and sustain scientific research.
  • Institution Building: Led to the establishment and expansion of national research laboratories (under CSIR), specialized institutions (e.g., BARC, IITs, AIIMS, DRDO), and universities.
  • Focus on Basic Research: Stressed the importance of fundamental scientific inquiry as the bedrock for technological advancement.
  • "Big Science" Approach: Prioritized large-scale, strategic projects like nuclear energy and space.
Impact/Significance
  • Strong Foundation: Laid the robust institutional and policy framework for India's S&T ecosystem.
  • Self-Reliance: Enabled India to achieve self-sufficiency in critical areas like food production (Green Revolution) and develop strategic capabilities (nuclear, space).
  • Human Capital Development: Contributed to creating a large pool of scientific and technical manpower.
Limitations/Critiques
  • Limited Focus on Commercialization: Less emphasis on translating research into industrial products and economic value.
  • Public Sector Dominance: Did not adequately involve or incentivize the private sector in R&D.
  • Bureaucratic Hurdles: Centralized decision-making and rigid structures sometimes hampered agility.
  • Brain Drain: Insufficient opportunities compared to Western nations led to the emigration of skilled scientists.

Source: Government of India, Scientific Policy Resolution 1958; IGNOU: Science and Technology in India (MPA-016); Spectrum: A Brief History of Modern India.

Technology Policy Statement (TPS) 1983

Context
  • Experience of three decades under SPR 1958.
  • Realization that self-reliance required direct focus on technology development and absorption.
  • Global shifts towards advanced technologies and increasing industrialization.
  • Recognized limitations of import substitution and the need for greater efficiency.
Key Objectives
  1. Technological Self-Reliance: Develop indigenous technologies and efficiently absorb and adapt imported ones.
  2. Optimal Utilization: Ensure optimum utilization of existing resources, traditional skills, and human capital.
  3. Environmental Protection: Ensure technology development is consistent with environmental protection.
  4. Promote Traditional Technologies: Revitalize and utilize indigenous technologies where appropriate.
Salient Features/Highlights
  • First dedicated Technology Policy: Explicitly addressed 'Technology' as a distinct policy domain.
  • Emphasis on Applied Research & Development (R&D): Shift from primarily basic research to problem-solving and industrial application.
  • Technology Assessment: Introduction of the concept of evaluating imported technologies and their suitability for India.
  • Efficient Absorption & Adaptation: Focused on learning from imported technology and then indigenizing it.
  • Environmental & Social Considerations: Integrated environmental protection and socio-economic objectives into technology development.
Impact/Significance
  • Directed R&D: Led to more targeted R&D efforts in specific industrial sectors.
  • Greater Realism: A more pragmatic approach to technology acquisition and indigenization.

Source: Technology Policy Statement 1983 document (Department of Science & Technology).

Limitations/Critiques
  • Limited Impact of Liberalization: Pre-dates significant economic liberalization (1991), so its impact on private sector participation was still limited.
  • Implementation Gaps: Challenges in actual technology absorption and commercialization persisted.

Science and Technology Policy (STP) 2003

Context
  • Economic liberalization of 1991, opening up the Indian economy.
  • Rise of Information Technology (IT) and biotechnology sectors.
  • Globalization and increased international S&T cooperation.
  • Growing recognition of intellectual property rights (IPR).
Key Objectives
  1. Harness S&T for Sustainable Development: Ensure food, health, and environmental security for all.
  2. Encourage Innovation: Create an environment for innovation across sectors.
  3. Strengthen Academia-Industry Linkage: Promote Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in R&D.
  4. Attract Investment: Encourage increased private sector investment in S&T.
  5. Global Competitiveness: Enhance India's position in the global S&T landscape.
Salient Features/Highlights
  • Emphasis on Innovation: Explicitly recognized the need to move beyond just S&T to innovation for societal benefit.
  • Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): Focused on effective management of IPR generated from public-funded research.
  • Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Stressed collaboration between government, academia, and industry.
  • International Cooperation: Promoted international S&T collaboration and technology transfer.
  • Nurturing Talent: Focused on attracting and retaining young talent in science.
Impact/Significance
  • Shift towards Innovation: Marked a conceptual shift towards an innovation-driven approach.
  • Private Sector Engagement: Signaled a greater role for the private sector in S&T.
  • Increased Focus on IPR: Led to greater awareness and emphasis on patenting and commercialization.

Source: Science and Technology Policy 2003 (Ministry of Science & Technology).

Limitations/Critiques
  • Implementation Deficits: Challenges in translating policy intent into widespread action, particularly in boosting private R&D investment.
  • Fragmentation: S&T ecosystem remained somewhat fragmented.

Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (STIP) 2013

Context
  • India's growing economy and aspirations to be a global S&T leader.
  • Global economic slowdown and the need for innovation to drive growth.
  • Focus on inclusive growth and addressing societal challenges.
  • Recognition of India's demographic dividend and the need for skill development.
Key Objectives
  1. Position India as a Global Leader: Enhance India's standing in global S&T.
  2. Link S&T and Innovation to Inclusive Growth: Use innovation to address societal challenges (health, food, water, energy).
  3. Promote a Culture of Innovation: Foster innovation from grassroots to corporate level.
  4. Human Capital Development: Attract, retain, and nurture scientific talent.
  5. Strengthen Science-led Innovation: Create a paradigm where science fuels innovation.
Salient Features/Highlights
  • "Innovation" in the Title: Signified the full integration of innovation as a core policy objective, distinct from just S&T.
  • Inclusive Innovation: Emphasis on innovation that benefits all sections of society, including marginalized groups.
  • Open Innovation: Encouraged collaborative innovation and knowledge sharing.
  • Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) & Philanthropy: Further strengthened collaboration models.
  • Grassroots Innovation: Recognized and supported innovators at the local level.
  • Role of States: Encouraged states to develop their own S&T policies.
Impact/Significance
  • Inclusive Growth Focus: Clearly aligned S&T efforts with socio-economic development and inclusivity.
  • Innovation Ecosystem: Paved the way for initiatives like the Atal Innovation Mission (AIM), which significantly boosted the startup and innovation ecosystem.

Source: Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013 (Department of Science & Technology).

Limitations/Critiques
  • Limited R&D Expenditure: Despite the policy, India's Gross Expenditure on R&D (GERD) as a percentage of GDP remained low.
  • Translational Challenges: Difficulties in converting research outcomes into marketable products persisted.

Draft National Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (STIP) 2020

This policy aims to reorient India's S&T ecosystem for new global realities, crafted in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Latest Status: Remains a draft policy, but its principles and proposals are being implemented through various new and existing government initiatives and legislative actions.

Context
  • Global COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical role of S&T in crisis response.
  • Emergence of disruptive technologies: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Quantum Technologies, Biotechnology, etc.
  • Increasing geopolitical competition tied to S&T capabilities.
  • Vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat and global leadership.
Key Features & Objectives
  • Decentralized, Evidence-informed, Inclusive: A bottom-up approach to policy formulation, integrating inputs from various stakeholders.
  • Open Science Policy:
    • Core Principle: Promoting free, immediate, and universal access to research outputs.
    • "One Nation One Subscription" (ONOS): Envisioning universal access to scientific journals via a national license fee.
  • Strategic Technologies: Focus on nurturing capabilities in AI, Quantum Computing, Space, Biotech, Green Hydrogen, Advanced Materials, Sustainable Technologies.
  • Research & Innovation Ecosystem:
    • Strengthening academia-industry-government collaboration.
    • Catalyzing funding (e.g., National Research Foundation - NRF, passed Aug 2023, ₹50,000 crore outlay).
    • Promoting deep tech startups (aligned with Draft Deep Tech Startup Policy, 2023).
  • Equity & Inclusion: Promoting participation of women, PwD, and marginalized groups in STEM.
  • Science Communication & Public Engagement: Strengthen initiatives like Vigyan Prasar and MyGov.
  • Translational Research & Innovation Hubs: Focus on converting lab research to real-world applications.
  • Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI): Explicitly addresses ELSI of new technologies, promoting responsible innovation.
Challenges
  • Funding: Securing adequate and sustained funding for ambitious goals.
  • Resistance to Open Science: Potential resistance from traditional publishers.
  • Capacity Building: Ensuring sufficient skilled manpower and infrastructure.
  • Digital Divide: Bridging the gap in access and digital literacy.
  • Bureaucratic Inertia: Overcoming traditional administrative hurdles.

Source: Draft National Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (STIP) 2020 (DST); PIB releases.

Evolution of S&T Policies: A Snapshot

Policy Year Key Focus Core Philosophy Key Initiatives/Impact
SPR 1958 Basic Research, Institution Building State-led, Self-reliance, Scientific Temper IITs, BARC, CSIR, ISRO (foundational), Green Revolution
TPS 1983 Indigenous Technology, Absorption of Imported Tech Application-oriented, Environmental concerns More targeted R&D
STP 2003 Innovation, PPPs, IPR, Globalization Sustainable Development, Global Competitiveness Emphasis on private sector, IPR awareness
STIP 2013 Innovation for Inclusive Growth, Grassroots Innovation Science-led Innovation, Societal Impact Atal Innovation Mission, startup ecosystem boost
Draft STIP 2020 Open Science, Strategic Tech, Equity, ELSI Decentralized, Evidence-informed, Atmanirbhar Bharat NRF (approved 2023), IndiaAI Mission (approved 2024), ONOS proposal

Prelims-Ready Pointers

SPR 1958

Nehruvian vision, Scientific Temper (Art 51A(h)), state-led, basic research, Big Science (Nuclear, Space), institutions like CSIR, IITs, BARC, AIIMS.

TPS 1983

First 'Technology' policy, indigenous tech, absorption/adaptation, environmental focus.

STP 2003

Post-liberalization, IT/Biotech growth, Innovation focus, PPPs, IPR, global competitiveness.

STIP 2013

'Innovation' fully integrated, inclusive growth, grassroots innovation, open innovation, paved way for AIM.

Draft STIP 2020 (Latest)

  • Key Principles: Decentralized, evidence-informed, inclusive.
  • Major Thrusts: Open Science Policy (free access to research), "One Nation One Subscription" (ONOS).
  • Focus Areas: Strategic technologies (AI, Quantum), strong R&D ecosystem (NRF), equity & inclusion, ELSI.
  • Current Status: Draft, but principles reflected in recent initiatives.

Mains-Ready Analytical Notes

Major Debates/Discussions
  • Evolution of Self-Reliance: From import substitution (Nehruvian) to competitive indigenous development and global partnerships (STIP 2020).
  • Funding R&D: Persistent challenge of low GERD; role of private vs. public funding.
  • "Valley of Death": Bridging gap between lab research and commercialization.
  • Role of Innovation: From side-note to central pillar (STP 2003, STIP 2013, STIP 2020).
  • Open Science Debate: Pros (equity, transparency) vs. Cons (publisher resistance, funding models).
Historical Trends, Continuity & Changes

Continuity:

  • Enduring commitment to S&T for national development.
  • Emphasis on human resource development.
  • Strategic autonomy in key sectors.

Changes:

  • Pure science applied technology innovation.
  • State-led increasing private sector involvement.
  • Domestic focus greater international collaboration & global competitiveness.
  • Increasing emphasis on societal impact, inclusivity, and ethical considerations (ELSI).
Contemporary Relevance/Significance
  • Atmanirbhar Bharat: Echoes Nehruvian vision with a globalized approach.
  • Digital Transformation: Policies enabling India's Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) leadership.
  • Addressing Grand Challenges: Leveraging S&T for climate change, health crises, food security (aligning with SDGs).
  • Global Leadership: Ambition reflected in STIP 2020 (strategic tech, open science).
Real-world/Data-backed Recent Examples (Last 1 year)
  • National Research Foundation (NRF) Approval (2023): Direct outcome of STIP 2020 (Source: PIB, Aug 2023).
  • IndiaAI Mission (2024): Focus on strategic tech from STIP 2020 (Source: PIB, Mar 2024).
  • Deep Tech Startup Policy (Draft 2023): Reflects shift to innovation and commercialization (Source: MeitY, 2023).
  • India's climb in Global Innovation Index (GII 2023): Attributed to innovation ecosystem efforts (Source: WIPO, GII 2023).
Integration of Value-added Points
  • NITI Aayog's Role: Key in policy formulation and implementation (e.g., India Innovation Index).
  • Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP) model: Evolved from nascent concept to significant focus.

Current Affairs & Recent Developments (Last 1 Year)

National Research Foundation (NRF) Bill, 2023

Passed Aug 2023, ₹50,000 crore outlay over 5 years. Implements key STIP 2020 proposal to boost R&D funding, especially in universities.

Source: PIB

IndiaAI Mission Approved (March 2024)

Substantial outlay, embodies STIP 2020's focus on strategic technologies. Aims to build AI ecosystem (compute infra, applications, ethical AI).

Source: PIB, MeitY

Deep Tech Startup Policy (Draft 2023)

Released by MeitY, aims to foster growth of deep tech startups, crucial for commercializing cutting-edge research.

Source: MeitY website, 2023

"One Nation One Subscription" (ONOS) Discussion

Long-term goal, active discussions continued through 2023, reflecting ongoing commitment to open science principle of STIP 2020.

Source: DST communications, news reports

UPSC Previous Year Questions

Prelims

Q. (UPSC Prelims 2020) What is the significance of the 'Strategic Technologies' in India's Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (STIP) 2013?

(a) To promote interdisciplinary research collaborations.

(b) To develop capabilities in technologies critical for national security and economic growth.

(c) To encourage grassroots innovation in traditional sectors.

(d) To establish international partnerships for technology transfer.

Answer: (b)

Hint: While other options are also part of STIP 2013, "Strategic Technologies" specifically refers to those crucial for national security and driving economic growth.

Q. (UPSC Prelims 2017) Which of the following is/are the objectives of the 'Atal Innovation Mission (AIM)'?

  1. To promote a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship in India.
  2. To provide financial support to small and medium enterprises.
  3. To establish research parks in universities.

(a) 1 only

(b) 1 and 2 only

(c) 1 and 3 only

(d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: (c)

Hint: AIM is a flagship initiative from STIP 2013's innovation focus. It primarily focuses on schools (Tinkering Labs), universities (Incubation Centres), and industry, not general financial support to SMEs.

Q. (UPSC Prelims 2014) The Scientific Policy Resolution (SPR) of 1958 mainly focused on:

(a) Promoting applied research in industrial sectors.

(b) Strengthening traditional Indian scientific knowledge.

(c) Developing basic research and building scientific infrastructure.

(d) Attracting foreign direct investment in technology.

Answer: (c)

Hint: SPR 1958 was foundational for state-led, 'big science' endeavors and institution-building, emphasizing basic research.

Mains

Q. (UPSC Mains 2020) How has the 'Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 2013' contributed to the development of Science and Technology in India?

Direction:

This question directly asks for an evaluation of STIP 2013. The answer should cover its key objectives (inclusive growth, innovation culture), features (grassroots innovation, open innovation), and impact (e.g., AIM, startup ecosystem growth), along with any limitations in implementation.

Q. (UPSC Mains 2019) "The 'Digital India' programme has the potential to transform the Indian society, but it faces several challenges." Discuss.

Direction:

While focusing on Digital India, a strong answer would link it to broader S&T policy objectives (like SPR 1958's scientific temper, TPS 1983's efficiency, STP 2003's innovation, and STIP 2013's inclusivity), showing how policies enabled this program while still facing challenges like digital divide and data privacy (ELSI, as addressed in STIP 2020).

Q. (UPSC Mains 2014) Scientific research in India is suffering from a 'lack of quantity' and 'lack of quality'. Discuss the main reasons for this and suggest remedial measures.

Direction:

This question provides an opportunity to critique the effectiveness of S&T policies over time. The answer can analyze the persistent challenges of low R&D investment (despite policies aiming to increase it), brain drain, insufficient industry-academia linkage, and propose solutions aligned with the latest policy visions (e.g., NRF, open science, deep tech focus from STIP 2020).

Trend Analysis in UPSC Questions

Prelims Focus

  • Evolutionary Focus: Tracing policy evolution, specific features of policies.
  • Link to Initiatives: Questions on major government initiatives (AIM, Digital India).
  • Specific Terms: Knowledge of "Scientific Temper," "Open Science," "ONOS" crucial.
  • Strategic & Emerging Technologies: Linked to policy intent.

Mains Focus

  • Analytical Evaluation: Critical evaluation of policy effectiveness (successes, failures, challenges).
  • Connecting Policy to Impact: How policies translate to national development, inclusive growth.
  • Forward-looking: Suggestions for future policy, addressing future challenges.
  • Interdisciplinary: Integrating S&T with economics, governance, social issues.

Practice Questions

Original MCQs for Prelims

Q1. Consider the following statements regarding India's Science and Technology policies:

  1. The Scientific Policy Resolution (SPR) of 1958 explicitly called for a significant increase in private sector investment in research and development.
  2. The Technology Policy Statement (TPS) of 1983 was the first policy to specifically address the absorption and adaptation of imported technologies.
  3. The Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (STIP) of 2013 introduced the concept of "inclusive innovation" for societal benefits.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only

(b) 2 and 3 only

(c) 1 and 3 only

(d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: (b)

Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect; SPR 1958 was primarily state-led. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct.

Q2. Which of the following proposals is a prominent feature of the Draft National Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (STIP) 2020, aiming for universal access to scientific knowledge?

(a) Establishment of a centralized National Science Bank.

(b) Mandating open-source software for all government research.

(c) The "One Nation One Subscription" (ONOS) model for scientific journals.

(d) Launching a specialized portal for commercialization of patents.

Answer: (c)

Explanation: "One Nation One Subscription" (ONOS) is a key proposal in Draft STIP 2020 for universal knowledge access.

Original Descriptive Questions for Mains

Q1. "India's S&T policy landscape has witnessed a gradual evolution from 'science for development' to 'innovation for inclusive growth'." Elaborate on this transformation across different policy periods, highlighting how the recent Draft STIP 2020 aims to further redefine India's scientific future. (15 marks, 250 words)

Key Points/Structure:

  • Introduction: Acknowledge evolving philosophy.
  • SPR 1958 ('Science for Development'): Institution building, basic research, self-reliance.
  • TPS 1983 (Technology Focus): Applied R&D, absorption of imported tech.
  • STP 2003 & STIP 2013 ('Innovation for Inclusive Growth'): Explicit innovation, PPPs, IPR, grassroots innovation, societal benefit.
  • Draft STIP 2020 (Redefining Future): Open science (ONOS), strategic tech (AI, Quantum), equity, ELSI, NRF.
  • Transformation Analysis: State-centric to multi-stakeholder, basic to translational research, domestic to global & ethical concerns.
  • Conclusion: How evolution reflects India's maturity and aspirations.

Q2. The Draft National Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (STIP) 2020 proposes an "Open Science Policy" as a cornerstone. Discuss the implications of an Open Science regime for India's scientific research and innovation ecosystem, critically examining the potential benefits and challenges in its implementation. (10 marks, 150 words)

Key Points/Structure:

  • Introduction: Define Open Science as per STIP 2020.
  • Benefits: Accelerated research, transparency, equity (ONOS), public engagement, innovation.
  • Challenges: Funding models, data sharing hurdles, IPR management, cultural shift, infrastructure needs.
  • Conclusion: Transformative potential but requires careful planning, investment, and collaboration.