Foundations of Social Justice in India

A deep dive into the conceptual frameworks, historical evolution, and constitutional vision of social justice, crucial for building an egalitarian society.

Explore Module

Introduction: The Imperative of Social Justice

Social Justice is a foundational principle for building an egalitarian society, ensuring that all individuals have equitable access to rights, opportunities, and resources, free from discrimination. In the Indian context, it is deeply embedded in the Constitution and has been a driving force behind various reform movements and policy interventions aimed at rectifying historical injustices and reducing socio-economic disparities. This module explores the conceptual frameworks, historical evolution, and constitutional vision of social justice, providing a robust understanding crucial for both Prelims and Mains examinations.

1.1 Conceptual Frameworks of Social Justice

1.1.1 Defining Social Justice

Defining Social Justice:

  • A concept that holds all individuals should have equal rights, opportunities, and access to resources, and that society should be organized in a way that minimizes disparities and addresses historical injustices. It seeks to ensure fairness in the distribution of benefits and burdens.

Absolute vs. Relative Justice:

  • Absolute Justice: An ideal or perfect state of justice, often philosophical, where outcomes are perfectly fair and equitable regardless of context. Difficult to achieve in reality.
  • Relative Justice: Justice as applied in a specific context, acknowledging existing inequalities and aiming for improvement within societal constraints. Focuses on practical remedies and incremental changes.

Types of Justice:

Distributive Justice

Concerns the fair allocation of resources, opportunities, and burdens among members of a society. Aims to reduce economic disparities. (e.g., progressive taxation, affirmative action).

Procedural Justice

Focuses on the fairness of the processes and procedures used to make decisions, resolve disputes, or allocate resources. Emphasizes impartiality and transparency. (e.g., fair trial, impartial selection processes).

Corrective Justice

Aims to rectify wrongs or injustices committed in the past. Involves compensating victims, punishing wrongdoers, or restoring a previous state of affairs. (e.g., reservation policies to correct historical discrimination, victim compensation schemes).

Dimensions of Social Justice:

  • Economic Justice: Ensuring equitable distribution of wealth, income, and resources; addressing poverty and economic exploitation.
  • Social Justice: Elimination of discrimination based on caste, creed, gender, religion, race, etc.; promoting equality of status and opportunity.
  • Political Justice: Equal political rights for all citizens (e.g., right to vote, right to hold public office).
  • Cultural Justice: Recognition and respect for diverse cultural identities, languages, and traditions; ensuring equitable representation and participation in cultural life.

Key Principles of Social Justice:

Equality

Treating all individuals identically in rights and opportunities.

Equity

Differentiated support based on needs for fair outcomes.

Liberty

Freedom to pursue goals without undue interference.

Dignity

Inherent worth and respect for every human being.

Non-discrimination

Prohibition of unfair treatment based on characteristics.

Types of Justice Summary:

Type of Justice Focus Goal Example
Distributive Justice Fair allocation of resources/opportunities Reducing socio-economic disparities Progressive taxation, land reforms, reservation
Procedural Justice Fairness of processes/rules Ensuring impartiality and transparency Fair trials, transparent recruitment processes
Corrective Justice Rectifying past wrongs/injustices Restoring balance, compensating victims Affirmative action, reparations

Mains-ready Analytical Notes: Defining Social Justice

  • Philosophical Underpinnings: The concept evolved from ancient ideas (Plato, Aristotle) to modern liberal and socialist theories, challenging individual desert and highlighting structural disadvantages. (Source: IGNOU MPA-001, Unit 13 - Social Justice).
  • Debates on "What Constitutes Justice": Core tensions include Merit vs. Need, Individual vs. Collective Rights, Equality of Opportunity vs. Equality of Outcome, and the Role of State (Minimal vs. Welfare State).
  • Relevance: Social justice is vital for societal stability, inclusive growth, human development, reducing unrest, enhancing democracy, and fostering belonging. Crucial for national integration in diverse India with historical hierarchies.
  • Contemporary Relevance: Extends to global issues like climate justice, vaccine equity, digital divide, and automation's impact, aligning with UN SDGs (SDG 10, SDG 16).

1.1.2 Historical Evolution of Social Justice Thought

Ancient Indian Thought

  • Dharma: Righteous conduct, moral duty, cosmic order; emphasized social harmony and mutual responsibility. (Source: Arthashastra, Manusmriti).
  • Nyaya: Justice, fairness, impartiality; rooted in logical reasoning and equitable treatment.
  • Arthashastra (Kautilya): Advocated a strong state responsible for welfare of its subjects, including provisions for the poor, aged, and infirm.

Medieval Period: Bhakti-Sufi Movements

  • Challenged caste hierarchies, religious orthodoxy, and social inequalities. Preached universal brotherhood, devotion, and equality before God.
  • Bhakti Saints: Kabir, Ravidas, Nanak, Chaitanya, Mirabai – often from lower castes or championed their cause.
  • Sufi Saints: Emphasized tolerance, humanism, and service to humanity.
  • Guru Nanak (Sikhism): Strongly condemned caste system, advocated for equality (e.g., Langar system).

Colonial Impact & Rise of Reform Movements (19th & early 20th Century)

  • Catalysed by Western education, Christian missionary critiques, and internal awareness of social evils.
  • Raja Rammohan Roy: Against Sati, child marriage, advocated for women's education. (Brahmo Samaj).
  • Jyotiba Phule & Savitribai Phule: Fought for caste abolition, women's education, and rights of lower castes. Founded Satyashodhak Samaj (1873).
  • Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar: Championed widow remarriage, women's education.
  • Swami Vivekananda: Advocated for service to humanity (Daridra Narayana Seva), upliftment of the poor.
  • Dayanand Saraswati: Against idolatry, caste system, child marriage. (Arya Samaj).

Modern Indian Context (20th Century onwards)

  • Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: Architect of Constitution, championed Dalits, advocated annihilation of caste, reservation, constitutional guarantees. Authored "Annihilation of Caste".
  • Mahatma Gandhi: Advocated for Sarvodaya (welfare of all), trusteeship, Swaraj, removal of untouchability (Harijans).
  • Jawaharlal Nehru: Advocated for socialist pattern of society, planned economy, secularism. Key in enshrining DPSPs.
  • Ram Manohar Lohia: Championed "Sapta Kranti" (Seven Revolutions) including gender equality, caste abolition.
  • Jayaprakash Narayan: Advocated for "Total Revolution" encompassing social, economic, political, cultural changes.

Global Perspectives on Justice

  • John Rawls' Theory of Justice: "Veil of Ignorance", two principles (Equal Basic Liberties, Difference Principle - maximizing welfare of least advantaged). (Source: Rawls, A Theory of Justice).
  • Amartya Sen's Capability Approach: Focuses on "capabilities" (real opportunities) and "functionings" (achievements), expanding people's real freedoms. (Source: Sen, Development as Freedom).
  • Ronald Dworkin's Equality of Resources: Advocates "envy-free" distribution, compensating for "brute luck" (unforeseen circumstances).

Historical Contributions Summary:

Era/Perspective Key Figures/Movements Core Idea/Contribution to Social Justice
Ancient India Dharma, Nyaya, Kautilya Societal harmony, ethical conduct, impartial justice, state welfare for vulnerable.
Medieval India Bhakti-Sufi Movements, Guru Nanak Challenging caste, religious equality, humanism, universal brotherhood.
Colonial India Roy, Phule, Vidyasagar, Vivekananda, Dayanand Abolition of Sati/child marriage, women's education, caste reform, widow remarriage, service to poor.
Modern India Ambedkar, Gandhi, Nehru, Lohia, JP Constitutional guarantees, annihilation of caste, Sarvodaya, socialist state, radical social transformation.
Global Theories Rawls, Sen, Dworkin Justice as fairness (veil of ignorance, difference principle), capability approach (real freedoms), equality of resources.

Mains-ready Analytical Notes: Historical Evolution

  • Historical Context and Evolution of State's Role: Shift from individual reform to proactive state interventions (laws, constitutional provisions, welfare schemes). (Source: IGNOU MPA-001, Unit 13; NCERT Class XII).
  • Comparative Analysis of Global Theories:
    • Rawls in India: Useful for affirmative action understanding, but abstract for India's entrenched inequalities.
    • Sen in India: Highly relevant. Capability approach assesses development through real freedoms (health, education, dignified work), highlighting structural barriers.
    • Dworkin: Ideas on compensating for 'brute luck' resonate with policies addressing disabilities/historical disadvantages.
  • Continuity & Change: Quest for equality and dignity persists; methods shifted from moral persuasion to legal frameworks and state intervention.
  • Contemporary Relevance: Informs debates on reservation, LGBTQ+ rights, environmental justice. Legacy of reformers inspires activism.

1.1.3 Constitutional Vision of Social Justice in India

Preamble: The Guiding Philosophy

Declares India a "Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic." Secures to all citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship; EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation.

"Socialist" term added by 42nd Amendment, 1976.

Fundamental Rights (Part III) – Shielding Justice

Article 14: Equality before law and equal protection of laws

Ensures that all persons are equal before the law and are equally protected by the laws of the country.

Article 15: Prohibition of discrimination

Prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.

  • 15(3): Special provisions for women and children.
  • 15(4): Special provisions for advancement of SEBCs, SCs, STs (added by 1st Amendment, 1951).
  • 15(5): Special provisions for admission to educational institutions (private/unaided, except minority) for SEBCs, SCs, STs (93rd Amendment, 2005).
  • 15(6): Special provisions for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) up to 10% reservation in educational institutions (103rd Amendment, 2019).
Article 16: Equality of opportunity in public employment

Guarantees equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State.

  • 16(4): Reservation of appointments/posts for backward classes.
  • 16(4A): Reservation in promotion for SCs/STs (77th Amendment, 1995).
  • 16(6): Reservation for EWS up to 10% in public employment (103rd Amendment, 2019).
Article 17: Abolition of Untouchability

Abolishes 'Untouchability' and forbids its practice in any form. Enforcement of any disability arising out of 'Untouchability' shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

Article 21: Protection of life and personal liberty

No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Broadly interpreted to include right to dignified life, clean environment, health, education etc.

Other Relevant FRs
  • Article 18: Abolition of Titles.
  • Article 23: Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour.
  • Article 24: Prohibition of employment of children in factories, etc.
  • Article 29: Protection of interests of minorities.
  • Article 30: Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions.

Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV) – Guiding the State

Article 38: State to secure a social order

State to secure a social order for the promotion of welfare of the people, by securing social, economic and political justice and minimizing inequalities in income, status, facilities, and opportunities.

Article 39: Principles of policy to be followed by the State

State to direct its policy towards securing:

  • Adequate means of livelihood for all citizens.
  • Equitable distribution of material resources.
  • Prevention of concentration of wealth.
  • Equal pay for equal work for men and women.
  • Protecting health of workers and children.
Article 39A: Equal justice and free legal aid

The State shall secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice, on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall, in particular, provide free legal aid, by suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. (Added by 42nd Amendment, 1976).

Article 41: Right to work, to education and to public assistance

In cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement, the State shall make effective provision for securing the right to work, to education and to public assistance.

Article 42: Just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief

The State shall make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief.

Article 46: Promotion of educational and economic interests of weaker sections

The State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people, and, in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation.

Article 47: Duty to raise nutrition level and public health

The State shall regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties.

Constitutional Amendments & Judicial Interpretations

Key Amendments Impacting Social Justice:
  • 1st Amendment, 1951: Enabled special provisions for SEBCs (Art 15(4)).
  • 42nd Amendment, 1976: Added 'Socialist' and 'Secular' to Preamble; added Arts 39A, 43A, 48A to DPSPs.
  • 73rd & 74th Amendments, 1992: Mandated Panchayati Raj and Urban Local Bodies with reservation for SC/ST and 1/3rd for women.
  • 77th Amendment, 1995: Introduced Art 16(4A) for reservation in promotion for SC/ST.
  • 93rd Amendment, 2005: Introduced Art 15(5) for reservation for OBCs in private unaided educational institutions.
  • 102nd Amendment, 2018: Constitutional status to NCBC.
  • 103rd Amendment, 2019: Introduced Art 15(6) and Art 16(6) for 10% EWS reservation.
  • 105th Amendment, 2021: Restored states' power to identify SEBCs.
Landmark Judgments by Supreme Court:
  • Champakam Dorairajan v. State of Madras (1951): Led to 1st Amendment for reservations.
  • Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): Propounded 'Basic Structure Doctrine'.
  • Minerva Mills v. UOI (1980): Emphasized "harmony and balance" between FRs and DPSPs.
  • Indra Sawhney v. UOI (1992) (Mandal case): Upheld OBC reservations, introduced "creamy layer", 50% cap.
  • Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997): Guidelines for preventing sexual harassment at workplace.
  • NALSA v. UOI (2014): Recognized transgender as 'third gender', affirmed rights.
  • Puttaswamy v. UOI (2017): Declared Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right.
  • Navtej Singh Johar v. UOI (2018): Decriminalized Section 377 IPC (partially), affirming LGBTQ+ rights.
  • Janahit Abhiyan v. UOI (2022): Upheld 103rd Amendment (EWS reservation).

Constitutional Vision Summary:

Constitutional Element Provisions (Examples) Relevance to Social Justice
Preamble Justice (Social, Economic, Political), Equality, Fraternity Philosophical bedrock, outlines vision of an egalitarian society.
Fundamental Rights Arts 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 23, 24, 29, 30 Protects against discrimination, ensures equality, safeguards dignity & rights.
Directive Principles Arts 38, 39, 39A, 41, 42, 46, 47 Guides state towards welfare policies, equitable distribution, upliftment.
Fundamental Duties Art 51A(e) Promotes harmony, dignity of women.
Amendments 1st, 42nd, 73rd, 74th, 93rd, 103rd, 105th Adapts Constitution to achieve social justice goals, expands reservations.
Judicial Interpretation Kesavananda, Indra Sawhney, Navtej Johar, Puttaswamy Defines scope of rights, balances powers, ensures constitutional morality.

Mains-ready Analytical Notes: Constitutional Vision

  • Constitutional Philosophy: A charter for socio-economic transformation, blending liberal democracy (FRs) with socialist aspirations (DPSPs). "Conscience of the Constitution" (Ambedkar).
  • Role of Judiciary: Crucial in interpreting and advancing social justice (Judicial Activism, PILs), balancing individual rights vs. collective objectives, upholding Constitutional Morality.
  • Tension between FRs & DPSPs: Evolved from initial conflict to Harmonious Construction (Minerva Mills), recognizing their complementary nature.
  • Challenges in Implementation: Persistence of casteism, economic inequality (Oxfam reports), gender gap, access to justice despite Article 39A.
  • Contemporary Relevance:
    • Reservation Debates (103rd, 105th Amendments).
    • Rights of Migrant Workers (COVID-19 highlighted vulnerability).
    • Disability Rights (RPwD Act, 2016).
    • Digital Divide (access to welfare, education).
    • Specific Government Schemes (Last 1 Year):
      • PM-VIKAS (2023): Skill development and financial support for traditional artisans.
      • PM Janman Yojana (2023): Targets PVTGs for holistic development.
      • Mahila Samman Savings Certificate (Budget 2023-24): Financial inclusion for women.
      • Legal Aid Clinics Expansion: By NALSA, implementing Article 39A.

Test Your Understanding: UPSC Previous Year Questions

Prelims MCQs

UPSC CSE 2019:

The Preamble to the Constitution of India is

  • (a) a part of the Constitution but has no legal effect
  • (b) not a part of the Constitution and has no legal effect either
  • (c) a part of the Constitution and has legal effect also
  • (d) a part of the Constitution but has no legal effect independently of other parts.

Hint: While part of the Constitution (Kesavananda Bharati), not a source of power; serves to interpret other parts.

UPSC CSE 2017:

Which of the following statements is/are true of the Preamble of the Constitution of India?

  1. The Preamble is a part of the Constitution.
  2. The Preamble grants power to the Legislature.
  3. The Preamble is neither a source of power to the Legislature nor a prohibition upon the powers of the Legislature.
  4. The Preamble is justiciable.

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

  • (a) 1 and 2
  • (b) 1 and 3
  • (c) 2, 3 and 4
  • (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Hint: Statement 1 true (Kesavananda Bharati). Statement 2 false. Statement 3 true. Statement 4 false (non-justiciable).

UPSC CSE 2020:

Under the Indian Constitution, concentration of wealth violates

  • (a) The concept of welfare state
  • (b) The Directive Principles of State Policy
  • (c) The Right to Equality
  • (d) The Right to Freedom

Hint: Article 39(c) of DPSP directly targets concentration of wealth.

Mains Questions

UPSC CSE 2021:

"The Right to Privacy is not an absolute right. It is subject to certain limitations." Discuss the context and implications of this statement. (150 words)

Direction: Relates to Puttaswamy judgment (Subtopic 1.1.3). Discuss origins (implicit in Art 21), declaration as fundamental. Then discuss reasonable restrictions (e.g., national security, public order, crime prevention) as stated by SC. Implications: balance between individual liberty and state's legitimate interests, importance for data protection, dignity.

UPSC CSE 2018:

What are the impediments to the success of Panchayati Raj in India? (150 words)

Direction: Relates to 73rd/74th Amendments (Subtopic 1.1.3) crucial for political and social justice at grassroots. Impediments: insufficient devolution of powers/funds/functionaries; parallel bodies; bureaucratic/political interference; lack of capacity building; persisting social inequalities affecting participation of marginalized groups.

UPSC CSE 2017:

The concept of cooperative federalism has been increasingly emphasized in recent years. Highlight the drawbacks in the existing structure and the extent to which NITI Aayog has been able to address this dilemma. (250 words)

Direction: Effective cooperative federalism (often through NITI Aayog) is crucial for implementing social justice schemes (health, education, poverty alleviation – rooted in DPSPs). Discuss issues like competitive federalism, fiscal imbalances, lack of effective inter-state coordination, and how NITI Aayog tries to address these through shared vision, capacity building, and collaborative mechanisms.

Trend Analysis: UPSC Social Justice Questions

Prelims Trend

  • Focus: Direct, factual, based on constitutional provisions (Preamble, FRs, DPSPs, Amendments).
  • Evolution (Last 10 years): Shift from memorizing Articles to understanding implications/purpose (e.g., concentration of wealth, basic structure). Landmark judgments are frequently asked, sometimes linked to specific articles. Schemes related to social justice often appear under "Government Schemes."
  • Example: Questions on Preamble or specific Articles (e.g., Art 17, Art 46). Amendments (103rd, 105th) high-priority after enactment.

Mains Trend

  • Focus: Analytical depth, linking concepts to real-world issues, contemporary debates, government policies. Tests integration of constitutional provisions with practical implementation and challenges.
  • Evolution (Last 10 years): More interdisciplinary, demanding holistic understanding of how social justice intersects with governance, economy, legal frameworks.
  • Recent Trends: More analytical, asking for critique, challenges, effectiveness of policies, role of institutions (judiciary, NITI Aayog), philosophical underpinnings. Growing emphasis on current affairs (new reservation policies, LGBTQ+ rights, social impact of technology).

Original MCQs for Prelims

1. Consider the following statements regarding the 'Preamble' of the Indian Constitution:

  1. The term 'Socialist' was added to the Preamble by the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act.
  2. The Preamble is not justiciable in a court of law.
  3. The Preamble explicitly mentions 'Economic Justice' as a goal for the Indian state.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • (a) 1 and 2 only
  • (b) 2 and 3 only
  • (c) 3 only
  • (d) 1, 2 and 3

Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect (42nd Amendment). Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct (Justice, social, economic and political).

2. With reference to the Constitutional provisions for social justice in India, consider the following statements:

  1. Article 15(4) empowers the State to make special provisions for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.
  2. The 105th Constitutional Amendment Act allowed states to identify socially and educationally backward classes (SEBCs).
  3. The concept of 'creamy layer' was introduced by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney case, primarily for reservations in promotion for SC/STs.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • (a) 1 and 2 only
  • (b) 2 and 3 only
  • (c) 1 and 3 only
  • (d) 1, 2 and 3

Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is incorrect (creamy layer for OBCs in Indra Sawhney; SC/ST in promotions debated and reaffirmed in N. Nagaraj).

Original Descriptive Questions for Mains

1. "The Indian Constitution seeks to establish a social revolution through a harmonious balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy." Elucidate this statement with relevant examples from judicial pronouncements and government policies. (15 marks, 250 words)

Key points/Structure:

  • Introduction: Constitution's aim for socio-economic transformation, FRs and DPSPs as twin pillars.
  • FRs as tools: How FRs (Art 14, 15, 16, 17, 21 etc.) provide basic guarantees for equality, non-discrimination, dignity, acting as a shield.
  • DPSPs as guiding stars: Explain how DPSPs (Art 38, 39, 46 etc.) provide positive obligations and roadmap for state to achieve welfare and social justice.
  • Harmony and Balance: Discuss judicial evolution from initial conflict (Champakam Dorairajan) to harmonious construction (Minerva Mills, Kesavananda Bharati), where both work synergistically.
  • Examples:
    • Judicial: Minerva Mills (balance), Vishaka (Art 21 and DPSP on humane conditions), NALSA (Art 14, 15 and dignity).
    • Government Policies: PM-KISAN (Art 38, 39), Ayushman Bharat (Art 47), Reservation policies (Art 15, 16 + DPSP for weaker sections).
  • Conclusion: Reiterate synergy between FRs and DPSPs crucial for constitutional vision, acknowledge implementation challenges.

2. Critically analyze the historical evolution of social justice thought in India, highlighting how colonial impact and modern global theories influenced its trajectory. (10 marks, 150 words)

Key points/Structure:

  • Introduction: Briefly define social justice and mention its long history in India.
  • Ancient/Medieval Roots: Briefly touch upon Dharma, Nyaya, Bhakti-Sufi movements for indigenous contributions.
  • Colonial Impact: Negative (deepened inequality) and Positive (exposure to Western liberal ideas, emergence of reform movements by Roy, Phule, Vidyasagar).
  • Modern Indian Thought: Role of Ambedkar, Gandhi, Nehru in translating ideas into constitutional and policy frameworks.
  • Global Theories' Influence:
    • Rawls: Structured philosophical basis for distributive justice, influencing affirmative action discourse.
    • Sen: Capability approach, pragmatic framework for welfare, highly relevant to India's development.
    • These theories enriched debate on what justice means beyond mere equality of opportunity.
  • Conclusion: Indian social justice thought unique blend of indigenous traditions, responses to colonial injustices, and engagement with global philosophy, continuously evolving.